W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil...

From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 10:36:47 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021110103622.03386550@127.0.0.1>
To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Jos De Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

OK, I'm fine with that.  Just checking.

#g
--

At 02:46 PM 11/9/02 -0600, pat hayes wrote:
>>... in keeping with the conventions for object and property names?
>>
>>#g
>
>nil is an odd case: its the only non-property  and non-class thing with a 
>name in RDFS. So the conventions don't apply to it properly. I'd rather 
>leave it lowercase, however, else people will think its a class.
>
>Pat
>
>
>>-------------------
>>Graham Klyne
>><GK@NineByNine.org>
>
>
>--
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>IHMC                                    (850)434 8903   home
>40 South Alcaniz St.                    (850)202 4416   office
>Pensacola                               (850)202 4440   fax
>FL 32501                                        (850)291 0667    cell
>phayes@ai.uwf.edu                 http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
>s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam

-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Sunday, 10 November 2002 06:48:27 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:03 EDT