W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 15:32:56 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021109153040.020647a0@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, <brian_mcbride@hp.com>

At 13:21 08/11/2002 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote:

>Do let me know when this is figured out one way or the other, and I'll
>update the in-progress RDFS WD-draft accordingly. Brian, can you advise?

I don't remember what we agreed.  I'd don't like having Rdf depend on 
something inthe RDFS namespace either.

Does anyone have any objections to putting this in the RDF namespace.  We 
already have new names in there to cope with collections.

Brian



>Dan
>
>On 8 Nov 2002, Dan Connolly wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 11:53, Dave Beckett wrote:
> > > >>>Dan Connolly said:
> > > >
> > > > I see
> > > >   rdfs:XMLLiteral
> > > >
> > > > in
> > > > http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF%20Model%20Theory_Oct_draft.html
> > > >
> > > > That should be rdf:XMLLiteral, right Dave?
> > >
> > > No, we agreed rdfs:XMLLiteral
> >
> > I'm fairly certain I agreed to no such thing.
> > Pointer to record, please?
> >
> >
> >
Received on Saturday, 9 November 2002 10:30:23 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:02 EDT