W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil...

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 15:23:05 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021109152246.02ccdde8@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>, RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>


At 12:36 09/11/2002 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote:

>... in keeping with the conventions for object and property names?

Its not a class.  Suggest we keep whatever it is now.

Brian

Received on Saturday, 9 November 2002 10:26:08 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Brian McBride: "Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs"
Previous message: Brian McBride: "Re: response to Brian's rdfs review"
In reply to: Graham Klyne: "Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil..."
Next in thread: pat hayes: "Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil..."

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:02 EDT