- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:42:07 -0500 (EST)
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, <brian_mcbride@hp.com>
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Brian McBride wrote: > At 13:21 08/11/2002 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote: > > >Do let me know when this is figured out one way or the other, and I'll > >update the in-progress RDFS WD-draft accordingly. Brian, can you advise? > > I don't remember what we agreed. I'd don't like having Rdf depend on > something inthe RDFS namespace either. > > Does anyone have any objections to putting this in the RDF namespace. We > already have new names in there to cope with collections. No objection from me (less work... ;-) > > Brian > > > > >Dan > > > >On 8 Nov 2002, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 11:53, Dave Beckett wrote: > > > > >>>Dan Connolly said: > > > > > > > > > > I see > > > > > rdfs:XMLLiteral > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF%20Model%20Theory_Oct_draft.html > > > > > > > > > > That should be rdf:XMLLiteral, right Dave? > > > > > > > > No, we agreed rdfs:XMLLiteral > > > > > > I'm fairly certain I agreed to no such thing. > > > Pointer to record, please? > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 9 November 2002 10:43:10 UTC