W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:42:07 -0500 (EST)
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, <brian_mcbride@hp.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0211091041040.19726-100000@tux.w3.org>

On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Brian McBride wrote:

> At 13:21 08/11/2002 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote:
>
> >Do let me know when this is figured out one way or the other, and I'll
> >update the in-progress RDFS WD-draft accordingly. Brian, can you advise?
>
> I don't remember what we agreed.  I'd don't like having Rdf depend on
> something inthe RDFS namespace either.
>
> Does anyone have any objections to putting this in the RDF namespace.  We
> already have new names in there to cope with collections.

No objection from me (less work... ;-)

>
> Brian
>
>
>
> >Dan
> >
> >On 8 Nov 2002, Dan Connolly wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 11:53, Dave Beckett wrote:
> > > > >>>Dan Connolly said:
> > > > >
> > > > > I see
> > > > >   rdfs:XMLLiteral
> > > > >
> > > > > in
> > > > > http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF%20Model%20Theory_Oct_draft.html
> > > > >
> > > > > That should be rdf:XMLLiteral, right Dave?
> > > >
> > > > No, we agreed rdfs:XMLLiteral
> > >
> > > I'm fairly certain I agreed to no such thing.
> > > Pointer to record, please?
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
Received on Saturday, 9 November 2002 10:43:10 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:02 EDT