- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 22:42:03 -0600
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>At 13:21 08/11/2002 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote: > >>Do let me know when this is figured out one way or the other, and I'll >>update the in-progress RDFS WD-draft accordingly. Brian, can you advise? > >I don't remember what we agreed. I'd don't like having Rdf depend >on something inthe RDFS namespace either. > >Does anyone have any objections to putting this in the RDF >namespace. We already have new names in there to cope with >collections. No objection, but seems to me that rdfs:Literal belongs there with as much justice. We could take the opportunity of relabeling it rdf:LiteralValue :-) Oh, and what about rdfs:Resource?? BUt make up your collective mind, guys, as I have to do major rewriting when we move things between namespaces. Pat ------- >Brian > > >>Dan >> >>On 8 Nov 2002, Dan Connolly wrote: >> >>> >>> On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 11:53, Dave Beckett wrote: >>> > >>>Dan Connolly said: >>> > > >>> > > I see >>> > > rdfs:XMLLiteral >>> > > >>> > > in >>> > > http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF%20Model%20Theory_Oct_draft.html >>> > > >>> > > That should be rdf:XMLLiteral, right Dave? >>> > >>> > No, we agreed rdfs:XMLLiteral >>> >>> I'm fairly certain I agreed to no such thing. >>> Pointer to record, please? >>> >>> >>> -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Saturday, 9 November 2002 23:41:38 UTC