W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night.

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:18:18 -0000
To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDCEHCCDAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: 20 March 2002 15:29
> To: Jeremy Carroll; Patrick Stickler; Pat Hayes; RDF Core
> Subject: RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the
> night.
> 
> 
> At 11:32 20/03/2002 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> [...]
> 
> >A fair point ... my example is bad stylistically, but does show 
> that the XML
> >syntax is as flexible as the n-triple syntax.
> 
> This is encoding information in the namespace prefix.  Is that 
> legal, e.g. 
> will cannonicalization preserve the distinction? Will this be another 
> "thats those rdf weirdo's bending/breaking the rules again."
> 

Hmmm, I think it's legal.

Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 07:19:12 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:46:20 EDT