RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night.

At 22:28 20/03/2002 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
[...]
>Oh... but more substantively:
>the hassle of dealing with an infinite number
>of rdf:_1 rdf:_2 things.

Hmmm.  Its been proposed we make all those subproperties of some common 
super property, e.g. rdf:member.  Is there anything we are likely  to want 
to say about any rdf:_nnn that is not true of rdfs:member.  Would that deal 
with this, or am I missing the point?

Brian

Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 08:44:34 UTC