W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night.

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:28:46 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020320152618.06a39e60@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 11:32 20/03/2002 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
[...]

>A fair point ... my example is bad stylistically, but does show that the XML
>syntax is as flexible as the n-triple syntax.

This is encoding information in the namespace prefix.  Is that legal, e.g. 
will cannonicalization preserve the distinction? Will this be another 
"thats those rdf weirdo's bending/breaking the rules again."

Brian
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 10:31:45 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:46:19 EDT