RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night.

At 11:32 20/03/2002 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
[...]

>A fair point ... my example is bad stylistically, but does show that the XML
>syntax is as flexible as the n-triple syntax.

This is encoding information in the namespace prefix.  Is that legal, e.g. 
will cannonicalization preserve the distinction? Will this be another 
"thats those rdf weirdo's bending/breaking the rules again."

Brian

Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 10:31:45 UTC