RE: literals, again.

On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> > Yuk. Having alternatives in a semantics is even worse. Couldnt we say
> > that having no lang tag is actually having a lang tag of "none" ?
> >
> >
>
> THe XML world are moving towards, but haven't arrived at, a point where xml:lang
> has a default value of "" and you can explicitly reset it to that value.

Interesting. Do you have a pointer or more info on this? Is it in one of
the (xml core?) WDs?

Dan