W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2002

RE: literals, again.

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 10:03:04 +0100
To: "pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDGEDGCEAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>



>
> Yuk. Having alternatives in a semantics is even worse. Couldnt we say
> that having no lang tag is actually having a lang tag of "none" ?
>
>

THe XML world are moving towards, but haven't arrived at, a point where xml:lang
has a default value of "" and you can explicitly reset it to that value.

Jeremy

Received on Monday, 1 July 2002 05:03:24 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jeremy Carroll: "RE: procedure for determining reserved vocab"
Next in thread: Dan Brickley: "RE: literals, again."
Reply: Dan Brickley: "RE: literals, again."

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:49:48 EDT