Re: Model-specific identity for anon resources, and its representation: A new issue?

On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> On Monday, June 25, 2001, at 10:16  AM, Jan Grant wrote:
>
> > Not really, no. You _still_ are going to need anonymous resource
> > resolution/unification in there somewhere: for example, if you decide
> > that two documents (or the same documentat two different URLs) are
> > talking about the same things.
>
> Sure, of course you are. I just want to move this out of the
> core level to something higher. This simplifies the core for
> those who don't need these things, and leaves it available for
> those who do.

Just don't use anon resources if you don't want them.

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
If it's broken really badly - don't fix it either.

Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2001 05:07:24 UTC