Re: Model-specific identity for anon resources, and its representation: A new issue? from Aaron Swartz on 2001-06-25 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from June 2001)

From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:11:17 -0500
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20010625171117.KFKE26850.femail19.sdc1.sfba.home.com@localhost>

On Monday, June 25, 2001, at 10:16  AM, Jan Grant wrote:

> Not really, no. You _still_ are going to need anonymous resource
> resolution/unification in there somewhere: for example, if you decide
> that two documents (or the same documentat two different URLs) are
> talking about the same things.

Sure, of course you are. I just want to move this out of the 
core level to something higher. This simplifies the core for 
those who don't need these things, and leaves it available for 
those who do.

--
       "Aaron Swartz"      |              The Semantic Web
  <mailto:me@aaronsw.com>  |  <http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> |        i'm working to make it happen

Received on Monday, 25 June 2001 13:11:19 UTC