W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: Model-specific identity for anon resources, and its representation: A new issue?

From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 20:20:34 -0500
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20010627014357.JWOB26850.femail19.sdc1.sfba.home.com@localhost>
On Tuesday, June 26, 2001, at 04:06  AM, Jan Grant wrote:

>>> Not really, no. You _still_ are going to need anonymous resource
>>> resolution/unification in there somewhere: for example, if you decide
>>> that two documents (or the same documentat two different URLs) are
>>> talking about the same things.
>> Sure, of course you are. I just want to move this out of the
>> core level to something higher. This simplifies the core for
>> those who don't need these things, and leaves it available for
>> those who do.
> Just don't use anon resources if you don't want them.

Err, I don't follow. If I'm writing an application that accepts 
arbitrary RDF (which I am), I still need to deal with them 
somehow as long as they are in the abstract syntax. With my 
proposal, I could just ignore their anonymity if I wanted.

[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2001 21:43:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:49 UTC