- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 20:20:34 -0500
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Tuesday, June 26, 2001, at 04:06 AM, Jan Grant wrote: >>> Not really, no. You _still_ are going to need anonymous resource >>> resolution/unification in there somewhere: for example, if you decide >>> that two documents (or the same documentat two different URLs) are >>> talking about the same things. >> Sure, of course you are. I just want to move this out of the >> core level to something higher. This simplifies the core for >> those who don't need these things, and leaves it available for >> those who do. > Just don't use anon resources if you don't want them. Err, I don't follow. If I'm writing an application that accepts arbitrary RDF (which I am), I still need to deal with them somehow as long as they are in the abstract syntax. With my proposal, I could just ignore their anonymity if I wanted. -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2001 21:43:59 UTC