- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 20:10:44 +0100
- To: Ora.Lassila@nokia.com
- CC: danbri@w3.org, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Ora.Lassila@nokia.com wrote: [...] > For "incomplete", unordered containers, some type of > simple "membership" relation might also do... I've generally assumed the reason for using rdf:_n properties for bags was that a graph was considered to be a set of statements, and if one wanted the same object in a bag more than once a simple membership property wouldn't do. Was this part of the original WG's thinking or no? I'm just curious. Brian
Received on Friday, 8 June 2001 15:12:23 UTC