W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 23:40:28 +0100
Message-ID: <3B5CA7DC.717B1B3C@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
CC: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>


Graham Klyne wrote:
[...]
> I think that in a model, or interpretation, there are just things that are
> denoted.  

Ah - I think thats the first time I've got stung by the ambiguity of the
term 'model'.

I meant to suggest that the datastructure which represents RDF/XML, i.e.
the data model, must represent the anonimity, otherwise it is not
representing what was in the RDF/XML that was read.

> The form of the denotation used in the formal language being
> interpreted (identifiers, variables, position on a piece of paper, etc.)
> does not generally exist in the domain of interpretation.  Thus any
> distinction in the form of denotation is not material in the domain being
> described.

Brian
Received on Monday, 23 July 2001 18:43:08 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:14 EDT