At 11:40 PM 7/23/01 +0100, Brian McBride wrote: >Graham Klyne wrote: >[...] > > I think that in a model, or interpretation, there are just things that are > > denoted. > >Ah - I think thats the first time I've got stung by the ambiguity of the >term 'model'. > >I meant to suggest that the datastructure which represents RDF/XML, i.e. >the data model, must represent the anonimity, otherwise it is not >representing what was in the RDF/XML that was read. That's the point I'm arguing: I don't think it's the anonymity that must be represented, but the lack of possibility of other knowledge associated with the name. (Where I'm interpreting "representing" to mean something like "conveying the same information about the domain of discourse") #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne Baltimore Technologies Strategic Research Content Security Group <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <http://www.baltimore.com> ------------------------------------------------------------Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2001 09:57:01 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:17 EDT