W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 13:50:48 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 11:40 PM 7/23/01 +0100, Brian McBride wrote:

>Graham Klyne wrote:
> > I think that in a model, or interpretation, there are just things that are
> > denoted.
>Ah - I think thats the first time I've got stung by the ambiguity of the
>term 'model'.
>I meant to suggest that the datastructure which represents RDF/XML, i.e.
>the data model, must represent the anonimity, otherwise it is not
>representing what was in the RDF/XML that was read.

That's the point I'm arguing:  I don't think it's the anonymity that must 
be represented, but the lack of possibility of other knowledge associated 
with the name.

(Where I'm interpreting "representing" to mean something like "conveying 
the same information about the domain of discourse")


Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2001 09:57:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:50 UTC