- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 16:43:48 -0400
- To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Signature/Minutes/000907-tele.html >* ACTION: Reagle, email poll of which option people want. >* ACTION: Reagle, get Brian/Barb to tweak text once resolved.. Based on the summary of options provided by Merlin [1] it is presently clear that 2 OR 4 (everyone seems to agree supporting both is not good) are the preferred methods. My present tally is as follows: 2) B64 (C(P(ASN1(D(data))))) (PKCS#1 wrapped digest) a. Merlin Hugues b. Mark Bartel 4) B64 (OID . C(P(ASN1(D(data))))) a. Philip Hallam-Baker If you have an opinion on this matter (or need to correct the above tally), please make it known by close of business (eastern time) Monday. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000JulSep/0398.html _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2000 16:43:52 UTC