W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2000

Poll: RSA structure

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 16:43:48 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20000907163806.00ba7170@rpcp.mit.edu>
To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Signature/Minutes/000907-tele.html
>* ACTION: Reagle, email poll of which option people want.
>* ACTION: Reagle, get Brian/Barb to tweak text once resolved..

Based on the summary of options provided by Merlin [1] it is presently clear 
that 2 OR 4 (everyone seems to agree supporting both is not good) are the 
preferred methods. My present tally is as follows:

2) B64 (C(P(ASN1(D(data))))) (PKCS#1 wrapped digest)
a. Merlin Hugues
b. Mark Bartel

4) B64 (OID . C(P(ASN1(D(data)))))
a. Philip Hallam-Baker

If you have an opinion on this matter (or need to correct the above tally), 
please make it known by close of business (eastern time) Monday.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000JulSep/0398.html


_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr.
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2000 16:43:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:11 GMT