W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: BIND and live property value consistency

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 19:32:15 +0200
Message-ID: <42CEB89F.2000206@gmx.de>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
CC: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> 
> I agree with adding the proposed wording (except note "it's" needs no  
> apostrophe), however I don't consider it sufficient unless BIND builds 
> on  RFC2518bis where we can make these definitions clear.

OK,

to summarize: Lisa prefers to either delay BIND (by making it depend on 
RFC2518bis), or to duplicate explanations (that will need to go into 
RFC2518bis anyway). Geoff and I think that the draft as currently 
proposed is clear enough, and that none of the alternatives proposed by 
Lisa are better (Geoff, you'll correct me if I'm wrong here).

At this point I propose that the WG makes a decision on this; it seems 
that all arguments have been exchanged on this and we really have more 
important work to do.

Speaking of which:

- What is the current RFC2518bis issues list 
(<http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=WebDAV-RFC2518-bis>, 
<http://www.webdav.org/wg/rfcdev/issues.htm> or something else?), and 
who is maintaining it?

- Is there a document change history that tracks all changes that have 
been made in the last (expired) draft 
(<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-06.txt>) 
compared to RFC2518?

- Are there any plans to actually start working on the draft again? Is 
there anything holding us back besides the three WGLCs we're just finishing?


Best regards,

Julian
Received on Friday, 8 July 2005 17:32:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:09 GMT