W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: BIND and live property value consistency

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 09:13:24 -0700
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Geoffrey M Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.stlrcm0yeochem@lisa.local>

I agree with adding the proposed wording (except note "it's" needs no  
apostrophe), however I don't consider it sufficient unless BIND builds on  
RFC2518bis where we can make these definitions clear.

Lisa

On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 04:43:31 -0700, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:

>
> Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:
>>  As Julian states below, this is a very reasonable thread to pursue in
>> the context of RFC2518bis, and given that RFC2518bis
>> is a current high priority deliverable for this workgroup, it baffles  
>> me why we
>> are having this discussion in a BIND protocol thread.
>>  Cheers,
>> Geoff
>
> Same here.
>
> Below is a proposed modest addition to  
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-latest.html#rfc.section.2.6>,  
> which currently reads:
>
> "Consistent with [RFC2518] the value of a dead property MUST be  
> independent of the number of bindings to its host resource or of the  
> path submitted to PROPFIND."
>
> Proposed text:
>
> "Consistent with [RFC2518], the value of a dead property MUST be  
> independent of the number of bindings to its host resource or of the  
> path submitted to PROPFIND.  On the other hand, the behaviour for each  
> live property depends on it's individual definition, which in turn  
> should define how the property value behaves (for example, see  
> [RFC3744], section 5, paragraph 2)."
>
> Feedback appreciated,
>
> Julian
>
Received on Friday, 8 July 2005 16:13:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:09 GMT