W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: BIND and live property value consistency

From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 09:40:09 -0700
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
CC: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BF24C1F9.4BD76%fluffy@cisco.com>

On 7/8/05 1:32 PM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> to summarize: Lisa prefers to either delay BIND (by making it depend on
> RFC2518bis), or to duplicate explanations (that will need to go into
> RFC2518bis anyway). Geoff and I think that the draft as currently
> proposed is clear enough, and that none of the alternatives proposed by
> Lisa are better (Geoff, you'll correct me if I'm wrong here).

I am very negative on a solution that duplicates normative text in two
documents. It is surprisingly difficult to keep it all in sync. (Note I'm
not against non normative duplication but that's a different story)

Received on Sunday, 14 August 2005 22:14:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:32 UTC