Julian Reschke wrote: > > OK, > > as announced one week ago, I have submitted the current draft text as > version -11. As far as I can tell, all issues that have been raised > during the working group last call should be closed according to the > procedure outlined by Joe > (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2005JanMar/0001.html>). > > Three additional issues were raised after last call. They have been > answered, and there was no further discussion since (> 2 weeks ago). > Also, they don't have any votes in the issue tracker, so they should be > closed as well. > > Thus, it seems we're done WGLC-wise. The next step now is to submit this > draft for publication as RFC, which will result in another last call in > which possibly remaining issues can be raised. Joe, Lisa? Lisa, Joe, it would be nice if you could follow up on how to proceed. As far as I can tell, we're done, and draft 11 should be sent to the IESG for approval as Proposed Standard. What am I missing? Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Friday, 25 February 2005 20:57:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:22 GMT