W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: Status of working group last call on BIND

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:49:31 +0100
Message-ID: <421727CB.1090404@gmx.de>
To: webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
CC: Joe Hildebrand <jhildebrand@jabber.com>

OK,

as announced one week ago, I have submitted the current draft text as 
version -11. As far as I can tell, all issues that have been raised 
during the working group last call should be closed according to the 
procedure outlined by Joe 
(<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2005JanMar/0001.html>).

Three additional issues were raised after last call. They have been 
answered, and there was no further discussion since (> 2 weeks ago). 
Also, they don't have any votes in the issue tracker, so they should be 
closed as well.

Thus, it seems we're done WGLC-wise. The next step now is to submit this 
draft for publication as RFC, which will result in another last call in 
which possibly remaining issues can be raised. Joe, Lisa?

Best regards, Julian


> 
> Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
>> Thanks Joe,
>>
>> from my p.o.v.:
>>
>> #2) Should be closed: consensus for the change made with 
>> <http://www.webdav.org/bind/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-latest.html#rfc.issue.2.7_unlock_vs_bindings> 
>>
>>
>> #5) Should be closed: has 0 votes on it
>>
>> #71) Should be closed: has only 1 vote on it from Elias, and he's 
>> satisfied with the explanations and changes made 
>> (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2005JanMar/0163.html>). 
>>
>>
>> #71b) The question raised by you, Joe, in 
>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2005JanMar/0165.html> 
>> is IMHO a distinct issue, it's being tracked with 
>> <http://www.webdav.org/bind/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-latest.html#rfc.issue.9_ns_op_and_acl>, 
>> you may want to open a new BugZilla issue if you feel that there's a 
>> risk that we're not following up properly.
>>
>>
>> Regarding the three issues raised post-last-call: please give guidance 
>> on how to proceed. So far, there aren't any votes on them, and it 
>> doesn't seem any new feedback is coming in. I think we still should 
>> plan to submit a document for publication in time before the IETF, 
>> which is roughly two weeks from now.
> 
> 
> I note that no further discussion has taken place since the issues were 
> entered (and replied to). There are also no votes on them so far.
> 
> Unless there's any new discussion on these topics, I'll submit the 
> current spec before the end of the next week and ask the WG chairs to 
> submit it to the IESG for last call.
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 


-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Saturday, 19 February 2005 11:50:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:07 GMT