W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: WebDav methods and idempotency

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:46:39 -0800
Message-Id: <a6f51217446e69cc8d14afbcdc7d79b1@mnot.net>
Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>


On Feb 25, 2005, at 12:34 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> You are right, MKCOL isn't idempotent, nor is MOVE. I'll raise issues 
> against RFC2518bis, RFC3253bis, RFC3648bis and RFC3744bis so this 
> get's fixed in future revisions.

Do you mean that MKCOL *is* idempotent, and MOVE isn't?

Thanks!


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 25 February 2005 22:46:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:07 GMT