Re: ETags?

Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
> Elias Sinderson wrote:
> 
>>
>> Thanks Roy, that's an excellent point that I hadn't considered. For 
>> the record, I am no longer opposed to the spec remaining silent on the 
>> issue.
> 
> 
> Ok, for the record: as Roy has explained to us, the current language is 
> actively incorrect and harmful, so the first step is to remove it.
> 
> I'm open to suggestions about anything else we can do. Note that these 
> suggestions should be made in the form of actual specification text. If 
> we can get a consensus about one proposal, I'll be happy to make that 
> change.

OK, as I haven't heard anything new (in particular no concrete proposal 
for specification text) I'm closing the issue for now (see 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-latest.html#rfc.issue.2.6_bindings_vs_properties>).

Best regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760