W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: ETags?

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:54:56 +0100
Message-ID: <41F96330.1070002@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: WebDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Elias Sinderson wrote:
>> Thanks Roy, that's an excellent point that I hadn't considered. For 
>> the record, I am no longer opposed to the spec remaining silent on the 
>> issue.
> Ok, for the record: as Roy has explained to us, the current language is 
> actively incorrect and harmful, so the first step is to remove it.
> I'm open to suggestions about anything else we can do. Note that these 
> suggestions should be made in the form of actual specification text. If 
> we can get a consensus about one proposal, I'll be happy to make that 
> change.

OK, as I haven't heard anything new (in particular no concrete proposal 
for specification text) I'm closing the issue for now (see 

Best regards, Julian

<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:55:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:31 UTC