- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:37:46 +0200
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Lisa Dusseault wrote: > > Here are some of the issues I've posted before: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004AprJun/0016.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004AprJun/0014.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004JanMar/0154.html, > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004JanMar/0146.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004JanMar/0149.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2004JanMar/0140.html > > I know that you've answered these emails before, but that doesn't mean I > consider the issues resolved. Joe's going to take care of resolving > them since I wouldn't declare consensus on issues I raised unless it > were overwhelmingly clear. I don't particularly want to discuss these > now because we don't have the issue tracking DB up yet. Thanks for putting those on the table; this allows us to at least proceed. I'll comment on them separately. I'm not sure why you don't want to discuss those though. IETF working groups by definition do their work on their respective mailing lists; whether or not a supporting bug tracking system (which will have to send change notifications to the mailing list anyway) is in place should not be relevant (although this probably will be helpful). BTW: issues do not get resolved by a specific person (not even one of the chairs), but by discussing them in the working group (== on the mailing list) until rough consensus is detected (and yes, the WG chair should try to decide when this consensus is reached). Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 15 October 2004 18:38:21 UTC