On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 06:23 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Hi. > > I'd really like to see some progress regarding this issue. In > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2003JanMar/0281.html > > I have tried to rephrase GULP so that it doesn't require the term > "binding" > anymore. This should address the concerns of those who fear that a > dependency on the BIND spec is introduced. > > To those who did object to GULP being part of RFC2518bis *please* > review > this? > > Julian Julian, I plan to review GULP ASAP. -brian briank@xythos.comReceived on Friday, 7 March 2003 14:59:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:03 GMT