On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 07:18 AM, Clemm, Geoff wrote: > Brian: > > These are the kinds of issues that led us to remove any discussion > of PROPFIND from the bindings draft. My conclusion is that our best > approach is to leave it up to 2518bis to define generically > how property values behave in the presence of multiple URL mappings > to the same resource (since that is base WebDAV functionality, not > something introduced by the binding spec), and the binding draft > will focus on the semantics it introduces (such as the DAV:resource-id > property, whose behavior in the presence of multiple URL mappings is > defined). > > The binding spec can then focus on the semantics that it is > introducing, > i.e. client creation of multiple URL mappings, the resource-id > property, > and atomic MOVE/DELETE via REBIND/UNBIND. > > Cheers, > Geoff Geoff, I doubt the consensus would be any easier to reach for text to go into 2518bis. The text has to go into at least one of the documents tho', so it's a good we're having this discussion. -brian briank@xythos.comReceived on Friday, 7 March 2003 15:05:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:03 GMT