Re: GULP vs RFC2518bis

I also support the inclusion of GULP in 2518bis.  The copy I read was the
copy
that still included the term bindings a few times, but it didn't seem to be
a
problem as I read it.  But if folks can remove those without impacting the
document,
that's also fine by me.


------------------------------------------
Phone: 914-784-7569,   ccjason@us.ibm.com
I do not check nn621779@smallcue.com

Received on Friday, 7 March 2003 16:05:17 UTC