W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: GULP (version 4)

From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:24:40 +0200
Cc: "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
Message-Id: <56C20FBC-DC21-11D6-9950-00039384827E@greenbytes.de>

Sounds good.

Am Mittwoch, 09.10.02, um 22:50 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Clemm, 
Geoff:

>    From: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de]
>
>    > > Geoff, you say in GULP4:
>    > >
>    > > - If a request would modify the content, dead properties, or
>    > > bindings of a locked resource, the request MUST fail unless the
>    > > lock-token for that lock is specified in the request.
>    > >
>    > > What are the "bindings of a locked resource"? The complete 
>    > > DAV:parent-set of the resource or a specific binding or the
>    > > bindings of the resource  and all its parents?
>
>    > The bindings of a resource identify its internal members (and
>    > therefore only a collection has bindings).  The bindings "to" a
>    > resource would be identified in the DAV:parent-set.  I should
>    > reword this to make sure nobody is confused ... any suggestions?
>
>    How about:
>
>    "If a request would modify the content, dead properties, or the set
>    of bindings to children of a locked resource, the request MUST fail
>    unless the lock-token for that lock is specified in the request."
>
> Or how about:
>
> "If a request would modify the content or dead properties of a locked
> resource, or would modify the bindings of a locked collection, the
> request MUST fail unless the lock-token for that lock is specified in
> the request."
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff
>
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2002 03:28:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT