uri@w3.org from November 2003 by author

by way of Martin Duerst

• Re: ambiguity in BNF: no non-numeric TLDs? (Thursday, 13 November)

edmckinsey@cox.net

• Re: RE: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Thursday, 13 November)

Hammond, Tony (ELSLON)

• RE: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Tuesday, 18 November)
• RE: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Friday, 14 November)
• RE: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Wednesday, 12 November)

hardie@qualcomm.com

• Re: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Wednesday, 12 November)
• non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Tuesday, 11 November)

John Cowan

• Re: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Tuesday, 11 November)

Larry Masinter

• RE: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Wednesday, 19 November)
• RE: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Tuesday, 18 November)
• RE: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Friday, 14 November)
• ambiguity in BNF: no non-numeric TLDs? (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Wednesday, 12 November)

McDonald, Ira

• RE: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Wednesday, 12 November)

Michel Suignard

• RE: ambiguity in BNF: no non-numeric TLDs? (Friday, 14 November)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

• Re: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: non-IETF tree URI scheme draft (Wednesday, 12 November)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: ambiguity in BNF: no non-numeric TLDs? (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: ambiguity in BNF: no non-numeric TLDs? (Wednesday, 12 November)

Last message date: Monday, 24 November 2003 12:27:52 UTC