W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: Spec authoring tools

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 09:34:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAHg3YQ7qogNLXEndvrrwLmQy6o86YZpWHeC3NM-EoLGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>
Cc: "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> There's still one or two CSS specs generated from the old CSSWG
>> preprocessor, but Bikeshed is basically a superset over it, so if you
>> can parse Bikeshed you'll be fine.
>
> Thanks. Would the CSS 2.1 spec be a good example of the output of that
> previous preprocessor?

No, CSS 2.1 was done with something else entirely.  The Fonts spec is
still on the old processor for now.

~TJ
Received on Saturday, 13 December 2014 17:34:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:21 UTC