W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: Spec authoring tools

From: Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:32:27 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMK=o4dpMDDLeWvBaQgPC19O-orFp9+ZU6BTj-SChJ77wXvakg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
wrote:

> There's still one or two CSS specs generated from the old CSSWG
> preprocessor, but Bikeshed is basically a superset over it, so if you
> can parse Bikeshed you'll be fine.
>

Thanks. Would the CSS 2.1 spec be a good example of the output of that
previous preprocessor?

There's also Hixie's custom pipeline for HTML, and the SVGWG processor
> which is entirely distinct.
>

Darn. I'll look at both. Thanks.

I recommend talking to plinss, as he's already done a lot of the
> compat work necessary to parse different types of specs.
>

Had a while back. Will do again.
Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 18:32:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:21 UTC