- From: Cantor, Scott E. <cantor.2@osu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 19:13:28 +0000
- To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
On 4/4/11 3:07 PM, "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: >We have the following statement in the 2.0 requirements: > >"Optionally from this set, exclude some subtrees (of element nodes) or >exclude some attribute nodes. Can only exclude regular attributes, not >attributes that are namespace declarations. TBD if xml: attributes can be >excluded" > >We are silent on the TBD question in the 2.0 documents. The exclusion syntax is XPath, right, so I guess it's a simple question: can you articulate xml:lang, xml:id, etc. via XPath? >It seems to me that it is application dependent on whether xml attributes >can be excluded sensibly and that we remain silent on the subject, and >remove "TBD if xml: attributes can be excluded" from the requirements >document. I think we should just answer the previous question, yea or nay. -- Scott
Received on Monday, 4 April 2011 19:14:24 UTC