W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > July 2009

Re: additional XML Encryption reference updates

From: Peter Saint-Andre <Peter.SaintAndre@webex.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:37:13 -0600
To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C67D0299.4898%Peter.SaintAndre@webex.com>
This looks good to me.

What is the import of having a normative reference to DRAFT-HOUSLEY-KW-PAD
(which not yet approved)? I would assume there is a general W3C policy on
downrefs of this kind, but I don't know what it is.

Peter

On 7/8/09 8:23 AM, "Frederick Hirsch" <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:

> I made additional updates to XML Encryption 1.1 references based on
> review by Cynthia:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Jul/0018.html
> 
> I made all the changes as proposed, except for the following:
> 
> (1) I removed the old XML Signature reference, retaining only
> reference for Signature 1.1, naming it XML-DSIG. I assume it makes
> more sense for XML Encryption 1.1 to reference Signature 1.1, let me
> know if this is a problem.
> 
> (2) Used http links for RFCs, not ftp links
> 
> (3) Did not add RFC 5335 as update to MIME (list in addition), since
> it is an experimental RFC.
> 
> Please review the XML Encryption 1.1 references for correctness. I
> also update explain.html and the redline:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/Overview_diff.htm#sec-Refe
> rences-Normative
> 
> This should conclude ACTION-328
> 
> Thanks
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 10 July 2009 20:38:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:59 GMT