W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Identifiers for XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 in XML Signature spec

From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:33:46 -0400
Message-Id: <A79CF74E-B6BE-44D8-AC6F-2B6311439011@nokia.com>
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, Ed Simon <edsimon@xmlsec.com>, public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
To: ext Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>

Ed

are you able to please update the wiki with this?

http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/wiki/ 
CharterDevelopmentForSignatureEncryption

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia


On Jul 10, 2007, at 10:23 AM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote:

>
> On 2007-07-10 10:22:16 -0400, Ed Simon wrote:
>
>> The XML Signature spec indicates the identifiers for using XSLT
>> 1.0 and XPath 1.0 as transforms. Should we not also include those
>> for XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 now that those are released (and will
>> generally be more commonly used now)? Or is that something for
>> v2.0 of XML Signature?
>
>> FYI, I'm having vague recollections that fundamental changes to
>> the nature of XPath between XPath 1.0 and XPath 2.0 may affect
>> the text we have in the XML Signature spec re XPath. I will
>> continue to contemplate this.
>
> I'd suggest that that's beyond what we need to do.  Since, as far as
> dsig-core is concerned, we're really operating under a "minimal
> changes" charter, I'd suggest we document and defer.
>
> (That said, it might be worth writing a note that initially defines
> some URIs.)
>
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
>
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2007 16:34:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:00 GMT