- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:28:42 +0200
- To: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 5/23/07, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > > If we do allow options to be typed in v1, then given we are using XPath > 1.0 we should stick with the simple types available in XPath 1.0: the > type attribute could be xs:string, xs:double or xs:boolean. We would > have to have some wording that stated the values were interpreted > according to the XSD rules rather than as XPath literals, but that > shouldn't be too hard. This would give us a clear upgrade path for a > future version where we might use XPath 2.0. +1 and we should immediately take (XPath 1.0) intersect (XML Schema 1.0) to avoid problems Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 12:28:45 UTC