- From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:04:07 +0100 (BST)
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
> Option 1: It's an error and we come back to it later when we're > talking about abbreviations. That's what I was expecting. > Option 4: The "result" port of the nearest "upstream" step that has > an output port named "result". It's an error if no such step exists. Noooooo! Far too confusing. If distant ports can be picked up like this, then inserting a step far away can change the plumbing. -- Richard
Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2006 17:05:00 UTC