W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Source without a step

From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:04:07 +0100 (BST)
To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060829170407.68B96720FE8@macintosh.inf.ed.ac.uk>

> Option 1: It's an error and we come back to it later when we're
> talking about abbreviations.

That's what I was expecting.

> Option 4: The "result" port of the nearest "upstream" step that has
> an output port named "result". It's an error if no such step exists.

Noooooo!  Far too confusing.  If distant ports can be picked up like
this, then inserting a step far away can change the plumbing.

-- Richard
Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2006 17:05:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:40 UTC