W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Source without a step

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:22:24 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87veobmp7z.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> was heard to say:
|> Option 1: It's an error and we come back to it later when we're
|> talking about abbreviations.
| That's what I was expecting.


|> Option 4: The "result" port of the nearest "upstream" step that has
|> an output port named "result". It's an error if no such step exists.
| Noooooo!  Far too confusing.  If distant ports can be picked up like
| this, then inserting a step far away can change the plumbing.


                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2006 17:22:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:40 UTC