W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Source without a step

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:22:24 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87veobmp7z.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> was heard to say:
|> Option 1: It's an error and we come back to it later when we're
|> talking about abbreviations.
|
| That's what I was expecting.

Ok.

|> Option 4: The "result" port of the nearest "upstream" step that has
|> an output port named "result". It's an error if no such step exists.
|
| Noooooo!  Far too confusing.  If distant ports can be picked up like
| this, then inserting a step far away can change the plumbing.

Agreed.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2006 17:22:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:48 GMT