W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > October 2007

RE: is p:inline underspecified?

From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:05:05 +0200
Message-ID: <a0ad8ffe0710121105m19550c59ifc0d0514c20b49fb@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

yes, agree that points I raised are rubbish .. I was corrected offline
and I did not respond back.

often, I need to be told the blatantly obvious for things to 'click',
apologies for taking up list time.

however, I still have a nagging thought  about p:inline related to
mime types and possibly media representation, though I am still
working through the spec (on my 3rd pass now) and maybe able to later
on formulate the issue more concretely in the coming days/weeks.

regards, Jim Fuller
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 18:05:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:42 GMT