W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > October 2007

is p:inline underspecified?

From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:52:33 +0200
Message-ID: <a0ad8ffe0710112352p7698de1p29d10a6fc4fb2a2b@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org


not particularly serious, but was wondering if we need to add anything
to p:inline element?

   * char encoding attribute

   * white space handling

   * doe ?

   * wrap element

Jim Fuller

Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 06:52:47 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: James Fuller: "a note on spec link usability"
Previous message: Norman Walsh: "xsl-formatter"
Next in thread: Norman Walsh: "Re: is p:inline underspecified?"
Reply: Norman Walsh: "Re: is p:inline underspecified?"
Maybe reply: James Fuller: "RE: is p:inline underspecified?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:42 GMT