[closed] Re: is p:inline underspecified?

/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| yes, agree that points I raised are rubbish .. I was corrected offline
| and I did not respond back.
|
| often, I need to be told the blatantly obvious for things to 'click',
| apologies for taking up list time.
|
| however, I still have a nagging thought  about p:inline related to
| mime types and possibly media representation, though I am still
| working through the spec (on my 3rd pass now) and maybe able to later
| on formulate the issue more concretely in the coming days/weeks.

Feel free to ask again :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | So, are you working on finding that bug
http://nwalsh.com/            | now, or are you leaving it until later?
                              | Yes.