W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > November 2007

Re: p:xslt and p:xslt2 (and "p:any-xslt"?)

From: <Deborah_Pickett@moldflow.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:57:14 +1000
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Cc: ndw@nwalsh.com
Message-ID: <OFB20565CE.98C3700C-ONCA2573A1.001F88B1-CA2573A1.0020A964@moldflow.com>
> The WG had been persuaded to change its position on this point, there
> will now be a single p:xslt step with a version option.

> Please let us know if this satisfies your concern. (A new draft with
> the results of this decision should be available later this week.)

It does, provided that "version" is actually optional, allowing the user 
to declare a "don't care which" preference where it makes sense to do so.

I look forward to seeing the details of the new rules.


Deborah Pickett
Information Architect, Moldflow Pty Ltd, Melbourne
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 05:56:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:24 UTC