Re: p:xslt and p:xslt2 (and "p:any-xslt"?)

/ Deborah_Pickett@moldflow.com was heard to say:
| Coming from a background of using Ant to manage XML-processing pipelines 
| (DITA Open Toolkit, if people care) I am somewhat confused over the exact 
| intent of the separation of p:xslt and p:xslt2.

The WG had been persuaded to change its position on this point, there
will now be a single p:xslt step with a version option.

Please let us know if this satisfies your concern. (A new draft with
the results of this decision should be available later this week.)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as
http://nwalsh.com/            | possible, but no simpler.