W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > November 2007

Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe?

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:31:26 +0000
To: "Vasil Rangelov" <boen.robot@gmail.com>
Cc: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5b1waad8cx.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In my opinion, the cost-benefit on this has gotten out of hand --
designing ways to mess about with environment variables which
reproduce the complexities of the union of all the likely
platforms. . .  Just say 'no'!

Having said that, the documentation probably does need to say
_something_ about environment variables, even if it's no more than "It
is implementation-defined what environment variables, if any, are
passed down."  I know from bitter experience that if steps are _not_
taken to pass the SYSTEMROOT env. var. when running on Windoz OSes
then obscure failures result. . .

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHTTVukjnJixAXWBoRAvfpAJ4mqvbNbUJd2eVp58q7GvJoWo4h4gCfYoAj
N+t4QnZvqhU2Hze/6UC7rcY=
=Foch
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 09:31:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:42 GMT