W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > November 2007

[closed] Re: p:xslt and p:xslt2 (and "p:any-xslt"?)

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 08:24:54 -0500
To: Deborah_Pickett@moldflow.com
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m23auq4i55.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Deborah_Pickett@moldflow.com was heard to say:
|> The WG had been persuaded to change its position on this point, there
|> will now be a single p:xslt step with a version option.
|
|> Please let us know if this satisfies your concern. (A new draft with
|> the results of this decision should be available later this week.)
|
| It does, provided that "version" is actually optional, allowing the user 
| to declare a "don't care which" preference where it makes sense to do so.
|
| I look forward to seeing the details of the new rules.

It is. Thanks for your comment.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | To think is not enough; you must think
http://nwalsh.com/            | of something.--Jules Renard

Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 13:25:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:42 GMT