RE: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Innovimax W3C
> Sent: Thursday, 2009 July 23 7:02
> To: Henry S. Thompson
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition


> > Since we're at working on Namespace, I thought that it was proposed
> > to describe all specification that makes use of reserved XML trigram
> > in PI or elsewhere to be described here. Is it still the case ?
> Not sure I understand what you're suggesting. . .
> 
> Well, pointing to xml-stylesheet, xml:id, xml:base etc.

We did say something about updating something--I thought, the XML
namespace 
document at http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace--to mention xml:id and 
xml:base, but it already does.  Was there something else we were
discussing
in this vein?

In any case, I assume Mohamed is suggesting we should also mention 
xml-stylesheet in this document (or any other such document where
names starting with xml are discussed) even though the xml-stylesheet
name isn't exactly in the xml: namespace.

paul