Re: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-
> > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Innovimax W3C
> > Sent: Thursday, 2009 July 23 7:02
> > To: Henry S. Thompson
> > Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition
>
>
> > > Since we're at working on Namespace, I thought that it was proposed
> > > to describe all specification that makes use of reserved XML trigram
> > > in PI or elsewhere to be described here. Is it still the case ?
> > Not sure I understand what you're suggesting. . .
> >
> > Well, pointing to xml-stylesheet, xml:id, xml:base etc.
>
> We did say something about updating something--I thought, the XML
> namespace
> document at http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace--to mention xml:id and
> xml:base, but it already does.  Was there something else we were
> discussing
> in this vein?
>
> In any case, I assume Mohamed is suggesting we should also mention
> xml-stylesheet in this document (or any other such document where
> names starting with xml are discussed) even though the xml-stylesheet
> name isn't exactly in the xml: namespace.


Thanks Paul ! that's exactly that
And this document needs a bit of update by the way


>
> paul
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €