Re: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mohamed writes:
>
> > Probably this part should be updated
> > [[
>
> > D Changes since version 1.0 (Non-Normative)
>
> > This version incorporates the errata as of 1 June 2006[1.0 Errata].
>
> > ]]
>
> Oops, missed that -- thanks, I've updated this -- please review in
> versions now available:
>
>  http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/04/xml-names-2e/xml-names-10-3e.html
>
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/04/xml-names-2e/xml-names-10-3e-diff.html
>
> > Probably the Non Normative reference to errata should be updated too
>
> Right.


Looks fine !


>
>
> > Since we're at working on Namespace, I tought that it was proposed
> > to describe all specification that makes use of reserved XML trigram
> > in PI or elsewhere to be described here. Is it still the case ?
>
> Not sure I understand what you're suggesting. . .


Well, pointing to xml-stylesheet, xml:id, xml:base etc.

Mohamed
-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €

Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 12:02:50 UTC