W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > March 2008

RE: Transition Request: (2nd) PER Request for XML Base Second Edition

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:08:29 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D3020AC864A7@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>

Thanks, Henry.

I just sent in the pub request.

Unless I hear otherwise, I'll assume you'll be able to
address the rest of what needs to be done to get this
out for PER.

thanks,

paul 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Tuesday, 2008 March 18 9:53
> To: steve@w3.org
> Cc: Grosso, Paul; Philippe Le Hegaret; timbl@w3.org; 
> public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; webreq@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Transition Request: (2nd) PER Request for XML 
> Base Second Edition
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Steve Bratt writes:
> 
> > I was ready to say "go ahead".  Then there has been a flurry of
> > emails with this same subject line that I simply do not have time to
> > follow and understand.  I've asked PLH and Henry to summarize the
> > state and conclusion of these, and have not heard back yet.  What is
> > the issue?
> 
> The PER request is for XML Base, but the email exchange is mostly
> about XLink.
> 
> Half the exchange is about timing of RFCs, and the rest is about
> whether SVG should reference LEIRIs or IRIs.  But that's a discussion
> for SVG.
> 
> None of the exchange is about the XML Base PER.
> 
> In other words, none of the exchange actually bears on the question of
> whether XML Base should go to PER -- rather it's discussion stimulated
> by people having their attention called to the new draft RFC.
> 
> I still don't think we need a call, and that we can go ahead with
> publication on 20 March.  In other words, I think if we _had_ a call,
> we would decide that none of the email exchange actually addressed the
> entry conditions to PER, and so we would decide to go ahead.  It would
> just slow us down to the point where we miss the publication
> moratorium.
> 
> ht
> - -- 
>  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, 
> University of Edinburgh
>                      Half-time member of W3C Team
>     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 
> 131 650-4440
>             Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
>                    URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
> [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without 
> it is forged spam]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFH39c6kjnJixAXWBoRAu1YAJ4wjcn5rCKW8xaRQutT5y0ebi7mVQCfWKcU
> eTGIi/bRM6hUg4O6Jx8fC/c=
> =KpOo
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:09:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:09:20 GMT