W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: Transition Request: (2nd) PER Request for XML Base Second Edition

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:52:42 +0000
To: steve@w3.org
Cc: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, timbl@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org, webreq@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bhcf4rsn9.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Hash: SHA1

Steve Bratt writes:

> I was ready to say "go ahead".  Then there has been a flurry of
> emails with this same subject line that I simply do not have time to
> follow and understand.  I've asked PLH and Henry to summarize the
> state and conclusion of these, and have not heard back yet.  What is
> the issue?

The PER request is for XML Base, but the email exchange is mostly
about XLink.

Half the exchange is about timing of RFCs, and the rest is about
whether SVG should reference LEIRIs or IRIs.  But that's a discussion
for SVG.

None of the exchange is about the XML Base PER.

In other words, none of the exchange actually bears on the question of
whether XML Base should go to PER -- rather it's discussion stimulated
by people having their attention called to the new draft RFC.

I still don't think we need a call, and that we can go ahead with
publication on 20 March.  In other words, I think if we _had_ a call,
we would decide that none of the email exchange actually addressed the
entry conditions to PER, and so we would decide to go ahead.  It would
just slow us down to the point where we miss the publication

- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:53:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:39 UTC